Added Value Services

Not long now until we are in RDR World proper.

We have spent more than 2 years working on, defining, articulating and then delivering our service proposition.

Or in other words, we can define to all our clients what will be the minimum they can expect from us, how will we provide this service and what the process involves.

If this is proving earth-shattering stuff for your current adviser and they are still some way off having a clear service proposition, then I suggest that they are not going to be ready to provide you with basic guidelines as to what you service might be offered in the new regulatory regime starting in January 2013.

I get the impression that a number of businesses are taking their current model, giving it a good old buffing and hoping that will be enough for existing and new clients alike going forward.

More worryingly, I hear it’s the same service with a different name but at much increased cost.

You need to ask the question, if this is all that you are being offered from your current adviser at this highly crucial time, do you see other added value services being developed elsewhere that you might be interested in?

It’s not going to be good enough to offer the current approach to financial planning without considering what else you can do to retain and attract clients to your brand in the very near future.

Virgin is a great example of a brand that covers a very wide range of services but with a core set of values that customers recognise and value whether it’s buying a can of cola, airfare or a trip into the edge of space.

Financial planners will need to consider what other useful services they can give their customers access to.

For example, we intend to have a link-up with a foreign exchange provider that will allow our clients access to better wholesale currency transactions, discounts and better rates on currency cards.

Whilst there may be a small financial advantage for the business, it’s more about developing complimentary services that are useful for our clients and help increase customer loyalty.

Focussing on your brand not your business, and what you can do to delight your clients has to be the new mode of thinking.

Roland Oliver

December 2012

Share:

The FSA/FCA & Post RDR Advice

A few thoughts following conversations with two other advisers about RDR now coming into sharp focus and how already businesses are thinking about what the post-RDR world might be like.

The FSA continues it’s death throes and appears to lash-out in a number of directions, none of which are particularly helpful and endearing.

Let’s face it, any regulator is going to be a pretty easy target. I hear from friends and clients in other industries about there respective oversight bodies and the names are interchangeable but the problems remain common.

I will return to this in a moment.

One of the very positive outcome of RDR thus far for me, is the genuine co-operation amongst forward thinking businesses and the willingness and desire to help each other.

Certainly a big change from the clashing ego-fests of Network and other bun-fights of the past. (that doesn’t mean that there aren’t IFA’s out there that I’d rather saw my leg off than spend 2 seconds in their Bond-addled company – But I digress…)

During our conversation, one noted that the FSA had stated that they were concerned that IFA’s were “shoe-horning” clients into an advice process…

Once I’d placed the tablet under my tongue and my vision had returned to normal, I was able to think about this statement.

I thought that the whole (or some) of the point of RDR was to focus on the advice process, have a defined and streamlined investment strategy and a clearly laid out structure for delivery along with transparent details on costs.

Naturally, in the course of considering how this might work in individual businesses you might also define exactly what type of clients you can work with and how you can best provide value to them.

If that means some prospects are headed off at the pass in favour of clients who “fit” and will be best served, is that wrong?

As regulators (in any industry) create rules and regs, then it’s natural for the participants to assimilate and adapt. This doesn’t mean that you can throw the head up when you get a result you don’t like.

Next week; “common sense – a forgotten art.”

Roland Oliver
May 2012

Share:

Resistance is Futile!

Those in the industry would have to have been living under a rock to be unaware of the coming Retail Distribution Review (RDR) and its impact on all firms in the industry post December 2012.

This period of transition throws up three main areas for consideration which are qualifications, service propositions and charging structures.  It also involves considerable planning around the systems, processes and controls we need to have in place to implement and support these considerations.

I could blog on each in its own right (and may well do so) but for now I’d like to focus on the qualifications aspect, how this affects everyone in the business and feeds into the quality of service we can offer now and going forward into the brave new post RDR world.

I’ve been in the industry now going on for 10 years and it’s fair to say the last time I sat an exam wasn’t exactly yesterday. I thought my studying days were a dim and distant memory so it has been unnerving and also quite refreshing to find myself delving back into the study books and revisiting old and new topics.

As my husband said at the beginning of this cycle of studying “resistance is futile, just get on with it” and you know he was right.  There was nothing for it but to just get in with it and now I find myself enjoying the work, yes, I actually said enjoying!

It has taken a few months but I am now of the mindset that these exam are not a necessary evil but in fact are a means to refresh my knowledge, a way to better myself and ultimately will equip me with the experience required to do my job to the best of my ability.  The knock on effect of this will of course benefit not only the team I work with but every client I help look after.

I’m not alone in pursuit of improved knowledge, my colleague Malcolm is working on the same qualification and Roland is working towards Chartered financial status.

It strikes me that in this current climate that clients are looking to firms who are knowledgeable, capable and professional and that means we have a responsibility to understand the rules and regulations within our industry and the legislation around the services and products we offer.

We pride ourselves in being proactive and not reactive and we can only do this with a sense of confidence if our knowledge is up to date.  We need to be constantly striving to better ourselves so we can say at any given time that the service and advice we offer to our clients is the best it can be.

The first issue for 2012 of The Personal Finance Society magazine is headed up with the CEO (Fay Goddard’s) letter to members which is titled “Helping you be the best you can” and I think this should be the mantra going forward into 2012.

I believe anyone involved in the industry at present should view the need for extra qualifications as a way to help them be the best they can be which will ultimately benefit the firm and the client.

If you’re currently reviewing the service you receive from your Adviser and looking at whether the proposition provides value for money you might also want to consider how well that firm is embracing the need to refresh and improve on their qualifications.

Is everyone involved in managing your finances striving to be the best they can be?

Dr Claire Armstrong

Client Relationship Manager

24th February 2012

Share:

The impact of the Retail Distribution Review

We had our interview with the FSA this week on their proposed new supervisory structure looking at businesses from a governance, control and culture perspective.

This was a very interesting experience for us as it would appear to have gone well and it was rewarding to be able to clearly articulate to the regulator what we do, how we do it and what it means for clients.

I’ve seen a raft of changes over the last 30 years in this industry but it finally struck me after our meeting with the FSA this week, that the changes proposed with the Retail Distribution Review are the the most far reaching of all.

The idea of identifying your service to clients rather than how you’ll pick them a product I believe is well beyond a vast number of current IFA businesses.

I also believe if your current adviser is not already in a post RDR position, they will not be able to adapt before the deadline date of the end of 2012.

I finally made the decision this week to fully remove commission from all we do for clients in favour of a advice based fee system and it was an enormous weight off my shoulders.

It frees up the mind to concentrate on the right advice and already I see clients more at ease with a monetary system that defines what the advice costs and not about getting the product sold.

A couple of very serious questions will have to be addresses by clients in a short space of time; will my adviser still be there post RDR and will he have a service that I’m willing to pay for?

If you would like a second opinion on your current arrangements, the type and structure of the advice you are receiving and how you are paying for it, please give me a call.

Roland Oliver

Share: